Updated: August 29, pm. Montana State University is writing new rules that would make it clearly off-limits for professors to have romantic or sexual relationships with undergraduate students. The new rules were developed over more than a year by an MSU task force and presented in October at campus forums to gather feedback. The revised draft is ready to be presented to the University Council at its Jan. Peterson heads the nine-member committee that drafted the policy. The new rules would bring MSU in line with a growing number of universities, including Harvard and Yale, that in recent years have imposed bans on romances and sex between professors and undergraduate students. That can include the power to give grades, provide professional travel and academic opportunities, to hire and set salaries.
Universities Grapple with Student-Faculty Relationships
Consensual relationships can create conflicts of interest that impair the integrity of academic and employment decisions. Such relationships also contain the potential for exploitation of the subordinate employee, student or student employee and the possible professional or academic disadvantage of third parties, and can subject both the university and individuals to liability.
Therefore, the university strongly discourages consensual relationships between supervisors and subordinates, teachers and students, and advisors and students. Should such a relationship develop, the faculty member, supervisor or advisor has the obligation to disclose its existence to an immediate supervisor and cooperate in making alternative arrangements for the supervision, evaluation, teaching, grading or advising of the employee, student or student employee.
In the event a conflict of interest exists arising from a consensual relationship, the individual in the supervisory, teaching or advisory position shall immediately notify the supervisor about the relationship and cooperate with the supervisor in making arrangements necessary to resolve the conflict of interest. Notification of the consensual relationship shall be provided in writing and signed by both parties involved.
Should a professor be allowed to date their students? “The rules at the moment are being governed by two sets of things, mostly covering.
If required, information contained on this website can be made available in an alternative format upon request. Get Adobe Acrobat Reader. Executive Policy 1. All members of the University share equal responsibility in this regard. All relationships between University employees and its students adhere to principles of professionalism, integrity, mutual trust, and respect.
All education and employment decisions shall be made free from bias or favoritism. Certain decisions may come into question when made by a person who has a romantic, dating, or sexual relationship with a person who may benefit from or be harmed by the decisions. The mere appearance of bias or impropriety resulting from a consensual romantic, dating, or sexual relationship may seriously disrupt the learning or working environment. Testifying, assisting, or participating in an investigation or other proceeding related to an alleged violation of this policy.
Adverse actions are actions that would dissuade a reasonable person from making or supporting a complaint of violation of this policy. Certain employees of the University who are licensed professionals must adhere to the rules of professional responsibility and ethics in their field addressing consensual relationships e.
College and University Blog
It is improper for a faculty member, instructional assistant, or other University employee to participate in the instruction, evaluation, or supervision of a student with whom there is an amorous relationship or familial relationship. Violation of this policy may result in disciplinary procedures. It applies to all full- and part-time faculty tenure and non-tenure track , lecturers, and graduate and undergraduate assistants, and all other employees.
All relationships between University employees and its students adhere to licensed professionals must adhere to the rules of professional responsibility and ethics in dating, or sexual relationship between faculty members and students in.
Take the news with you. Download the Cincinnati. Consensual relationships don’t violate the rules at many universities, including UC, but some music professionals and experts consider them unethical. On one hand, college students are adults. On the other, can they make a decision of their own free will when the other person has all of the power? The issue came to the forefront earlier this month, when The Enquirer reported on UC’s investigation into world-renowned flutist and longtime professor Bradley Garner.
UC tried to fire Garner after the investigators’ report found evidence of “persistent and pervasive” sexual harassment, but he retired before the disciplinary process ended. They both described those relationships as “an abuse of power.
Professor’s Relationship with a Student – Is It Sexual Harassment?
Even with all the risks associated with dating a lecturer, students all over the world still find themselves doing it. She offers money as another explanation. In Uganda, relationships between lecturers and students are fairly common.
Consensual romantic relationships between undergraduate students and faculty are not necessarily common, but they are potentially high-risk because they can generate costly sexual harassment claims by students against colleges and universities. In addition, they may damage participants professionally and personally. These faculty members often claimed consensual relationships with the complaining students. In the past few years, national media attention has focused on multiple high-profile sexual harassment allegations against professors, including several who had consensual relationships with students.
In their efforts to prevent sexual harassment, institutions should review and, if appropriate, consider updating their written consensual relationship policies. UE does not recommend remaining silent on this issue. Schools can take one of three approaches to regulating relationships between faculty and undergraduate students. Institutions should keep their campus culture and history in mind when considering policy changes.
Relationships between Students and Faculty Members or Other University Employees
Despite receiving media attention in and , UBC policy concerning faculty-student relationships remains unchanged and, for the most part, unspoken of. If a student and professor had a relationship for outside gain, it would be mediated using the Conflict of Interest policy. Mac Lean says student-teacher relations should be given more attention by UBC — not necessarily because he believes that a complete ban should be introduced, but because it deserves a conversation.
Margot Young, who sat on the Policy steering committee. The lack of any cohesive policy on faculty-student relationships has posed serious problems for the school and its community in the past. In June , UBC fired creative writing Chair Steven Galloway amidst allegations of sexual misconduct and reports that he had an affair with a student.
Date Issued: January 1, Date Last Revised: May 1, Relationships between faculty and students are particularly susceptible to exploitation.
This relationship vests considerable trust in the teacher, who, in turn, bears authority and accountability as a mentor, educator, and evaluator. The unequal institutional power inherent in this relationship heightens the vulnerability of the student and the potential for coercion. The pedagogical relationship between teacher and student must be protected from influences or activities that can interfere with learning and personal development. Whenever a teacher is or in the future might reasonably become responsible for teaching, advising, or directly supervising a student, a sexual relationship between them is inappropriate and must be avoided.
In addition to creating the potential for coercion, any such relationship jeopardizes the integrity of the educational process by creating a conflict of interest and may impair the learning environment for other students. Finally, such situations may expose the University and the teacher to liability for violation of laws against sexual harassment and sex discrimination. Therefore, teachers must avoid sexual relationships with students over whom they have or might reasonably expect to have direct pedagogical or supervisory responsibilities, regardless of whether the relationship is consensual.
Conversely, teachers must not directly supervise any student with whom they have a sexual relationship.
‘Failure modes’: Why aren’t student-teacher relationships banned at UBC?
The SUNY Board of Trustees approved a systemwide policy on Tuesday that restricts and discourages sexual or romantic relationships between professors and students. The policy also sets disclosure requirements for relationships among staffers when one person in the relationship has supervisory power over another. And it calls for schools to train students and staff members to spot, report and prevent harassment. The new policy is the first to set statewide rules on consensual faculty-student relationships or staff relationships.
Previously, campuses set their own policies.
At many schools, there are no formal.
HR contacts. Employee Relations contacts. Purdue University is committed to maintaining an environment in which learning, discovery and engagement take place in a professional atmosphere of mutual respect and trust. Amorous Relationships can develop within the University community between faculty, students and staff. The disparity of power when an Amorous Relationship is between 1 a student and a faculty member, graduate teaching or research assistant, or any other University employee who has educational responsibility over the student, 2 a supervisor and subordinate, or 3 senior and junior colleagues in the same department or unit makes the individuals involved susceptible to exploitation.
Relationships between faculty and students are particularly susceptible to exploitation. The respect and trust accorded a member of the faculty by a student, as well as the power exercised by faculty in giving grades, approvals or recommendations for future study and employment, make voluntary consent by the student suspect. Those who abuse their power in the context of an Amorous Relationship where there is Educational or Employment Supervision and Evaluation violate their duty to the University community.
Voluntary consent by the student or subordinate in a romantic or sexual relationship is difficult to determine given the asymmetric nature of the power structure in the relationship.